Comparisons

Comparisons between the Minerva wallet and other wallets helps us to see what might we missing features and it helps users with to choose the suitable mobile wallet.

Minerva is part of a 3rd generation of wallets, focusing on ease of use for newcomers and still give power users the needed tools to solve various problems they face when they interact with blockchains via mobile wallets.

There are roughly three mobile wallet categories:

Multicoin Wallets

EVM-Chain Wallets

Browser Wallets

Multicoin wallets are supporting as many coins and tokens as possible on all sorts of chains with different technologies and key management.

Ethereum protocol focus (mainnet, sidechains, L2) with vast amounts of tokens and an increasing number of connected chains.

The famous Burner Wallet started a new generation of wallets which are just a website and can be opened with every browser.

Users have typically a high investment focus and rely on integrations done by the wallet provider.

Users are more DApp oriented and like to experiment with DeFi and the full scale of the token universe.

Users are mostly newcomers learning to handle crypto with rather simple and basic interfaces.

  • Secure

  • Dependence on Financial Integrations

  • Focus more on Coins

  • Secure

  • Full DApp Support

  • Fokus on Ethereum or all EVM chains

  • Not Secure

  • Easy to Use

  • Limited Coin and Token Support

Trust Wallet, Exodus, Coinomi, Ledger Live, Atomic Wallet

Minerva Wallet, AlphaWallet, Metamask Mobile, imToken, Argent

Burner Wallet or Minerva Cash

Every wallet has pros and cons and suits different purposes, supports different applications and chains. Consequently, it is hard to say which one is better and so we try to give a little help to select the most useful one(s) for testing it our yourself.

You can join our Minerva Wallet Telegram channel , if you have further questions.